4.6 Article

An underestimated photoactive area in organic solar cells based on a ZnO interlayer

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY C
Volume 9, Issue 35, Pages 11753-11760

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1tc00745a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [51973031, 51933001]
  2. Shanghai Pujiang Program [19PJ1400500]
  3. NSFC [52073056]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai [19ZR1401400]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the impact of resistance of sol-gel grown ZnO interlayer on solar cell performance, revealing that UV-induced doping effect can lead to underestimation of photoactive area and overestimation of Jsc. The argument regarding high-resistance interlayers not leading to overestimated Jsc should be carefully evaluated.
Solution-processed ZnO is commonly used as a charge-selective interlayer between an absorber and electrode in organic solar cells. In this work, the impact of the resistance of the sol-gel grown ZnO interlayer on solar cell performance is investigated. We find that the UV-induced doping effect leads to a significantly reduced ZnO resistance, which gives rise to an underestimated photoactive area and thus overestimated short-circuit current density (J(sc)) for the solar cell measured without an aperture. Moreover, we show that this so far mostly overlooked issue can be unintentionally triggered during common fabrication and characterization processes, because the UV photons flux from a solar simulator, or from a light source for encapsulating the solar cell, are already sufficient in leading to the too much increased lateral conductivity of the ZnO. Finally, we demonstrate that interlayers with rather high sheet resistance can lead to an overestimation of J(sc) (e.g. by 10% for a 10 M omega per square interlayer in a 2 mm(2) device). Therefore, the validity of the argument that high-resistance interlayers do not lead to overestimated J(sc) should always be carefully evaluated.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available