4.3 Article

Sex Differences in Adolescent Bullying Behaviours

Journal

PSYCHOSOCIAL INTERVENTION
Volume 30, Issue 2, Pages 95-100

Publisher

COLEGIO OFICIAL PSICOLOGOS MADRID
DOI: 10.5093/pi2021a1

Keywords

Bullying; Adolescence; Sex differences

Funding

  1. Delegacion del Gobierno para el Plan Nacional sobre Drogas [2018/008]
  2. Government of Galicia under grant Programa de axudas a etapa predoutoral
  3. Irish Research Council
  4. European Union [713279]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found no differences in cyberbullying rates between boys and girls, with more bully-victims among boys in cases of bullying. Differences were found in specific bullying behaviors, but they were discrete, discouraging the use of clearly differentiated preventive strategies for boys and girls.
In recent decades there has been a progressive increase in concern and research into the problems of peer aggression, both in the educational setting and more recently, online. The present study sought to explore sex differences in traditional bullying and cyberbullying, since current literature has not reached a consensus in how bullying involvement could be moderated by sex. The sample consisted of 3,174 adolescents aged 12-17 years old who completed a paper survey which included the European Bullying Intervention Project Questionnaire and the European Cyberbullying Intervention Project Questionnaire. The main results found no differences in cyberbullying rates for boys and girls. In the case of bullying, there were more bully-victims among the boys, but no differences were found in the pure victims or pure perpetrators. When analysing the specific bullying behaviours suffered or perpetrated, several differences were found. However, said differences were discrete and it seems that there are not distinctly differentiated bullying patterns, which discourages the use of clearly differentiated preventive strategies for boys and girls.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available