4.7 Article

Laser ablation split stream for in situ sulfur isotope and elemental analysis

Journal

JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL ATOMIC SPECTROMETRY
Volume 36, Issue 6, Pages 1118-1124

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1ja00083g

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Helmholtz-Rekrutierungsinitiative

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The fsLASS-ICP-MS technique allows for simultaneous determination of sulfur isotope ratios and trace element chemistry in a wide selection of sulfides and sulfates, achieving high precision quantification of major and trace elements in sulfide minerals. While LASS shows lower sensitivity and higher limits of detection compared to direct use of LA-ICP-MS, the compromise is acceptable due to the additional information gained from obtaining isotopic and elemental compositions simultaneously.
In situ sulfur (S) isotope ratios and trace element chemistry were simultaneously determined in a wide selection of different (natural) sulfides and sulfates using femtosecond laser ablation split stream (fsLASS) inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). The laser aerosol is split between a sequential quadrupole ICP-MS for trace element quantification and a multi-collector ICP-MS (MC-ICP-MS) for stable sulfur isotope ratio measurements. This LASS method is able to simultaneously determine S isotope ratios and element chemistry without a compromise in the measurement precision and measurement accuracy of the S isotope ratios. The quantification of major and trace elements in sulfide minerals down to the mu g g(-1) level was achieved. LASS shows overall lower sensitivity and higher limits of detection in comparison to direct trace element determination using LA-ICP-MS only, due to the lower amounts of sample introduced into the ICP-qMS. This compromise is acceptable given the additional information gained from obtaining simultaneously both the isotopic and elemental compositions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available