Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Multiple comparisons: a tutorial. Part 1. Understanding hypothesis testing
Michael T. Lawson et al.
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY (2021)
Outcomes After Minimally-invasive Versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy A Pan-European Propensity Score Matched Study
Sjors Klompmaker et al.
ANNALS OF SURGERY (2020)
Predictors and outcomes of converted minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy: a propensity score matched analysis
Caitlin A. Hester et al.
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES (2020)
Surgical, survival, and oncological outcomes after vascular resection in robotic and open pancreaticoduodenectomy
Bor-Uei Shyr et al.
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES (2020)
The Miami International Evidence-based Guidelines on Minimally Invasive Pancreas Resection
Horacio J. Asbun et al.
ANNALS OF SURGERY (2020)
Histopathologic Predictors of Survival and Recurrence in Resected Ampullary Adenocarcinoma International Multicenter Cohort Study
Alma L. Moekotte et al.
ANNALS OF SURGERY (2020)
Comparing Short-term and Oncologic Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy Across Low and High Volume Centers
Robert J. Torphy et al.
ANNALS OF SURGERY (2019)
Outcomes of a Multicenter Training Program in Laparoscopic Pancreatoduodenectomy (LAELAPS-2)
Thijs de Rooij et al.
ANNALS OF SURGERY (2019)
Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic distal pancreatic resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Sivesh K. Kamarajah et al.
HPB (2019)
Laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours (LEOPARD-2): a multicentre, patient-blinded, randomised controlled phase 2/3 trial
Jony van Hilst et al.
LANCET GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY (2019)
Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: changing the management of ampullary neoplasms
Brandon C. Chapman et al.
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES (2018)
The impact of unplanned conversion to an open procedure during minimally invasive pancreatectomy
Zachary E. Stiles et al.
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH (2018)
Laparoscopic conversion in colorectal cancer surgery; is there any improvement over time at a population level?
Michael P. M. de Neree Tot Babberich et al.
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES (2018)
Robotic pancreatoduodenectomy at an experienced institution is not associated with an increased risk of post-pancreatic hemorrhage
Deepa Magge et al.
HPB (2018)
Assessing the impact of conversion on outcomes of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy and pancreatoduodenectomy
Joal D. Beane et al.
HPB (2018)
Conversion for Unfavorable Intraoperative Events Results in Significantly Worse Outcomes During Laparoscopic Liver Resection Lessons Learned From a Multicenter Review of 2861 Cases
Mark C. Halls et al.
ANNALS OF SURGERY (2018)
Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes Between Laparoscopic and Open Approach for Pancreatoduodenectomy The PADULAP Randomized Controlled Trial
Ignasi Poves et al.
ANNALS OF SURGERY (2018)
The Largest European Single-Center Experience: 300 Laparoscopic Pancreatic Resections
Safi Dokmak et al.
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS (2017)
Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma, Version 2.2017
Margaret A. Tempero et al.
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK (2017)
Worldwide survey on opinions and use of minimally invasive pancreatic resection
Jony van Hilst et al.
HPB (2017)
Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for periampullary tumours
C. Palanivelu et al.
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY (2017)
A Multi-institutional Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes of Robotic and Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy
Amer H. Zureikat et al.
ANNALS OF SURGERY (2016)
Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Cancer Practice Patterns and Short-term Outcomes Among 7061 Patients
Mohamed Abdelgadir Adam et al.
ANNALS OF SURGERY (2015)
Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy Should Not Be Routine for Resection of Periampullary Tumors
Safi Dokmak et al.
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS (2015)
Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic literature review
Ugo Boggi et al.
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES (2015)
Outcomes After Robot-Assisted Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Periampullary Lesions
Herbert J. Zeh et al.
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY (2012)
Laparoscopic vs Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Overall Outcomes and Severity of Complications Using the Accordion Severity Grading System
Horacio J. Asbun et al.
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS (2012)
Laparoscopic robotic-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy: a case-matched comparison with open resection
S. Chalikonda et al.
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES (2012)
The Clavien-Dindo Classification of Surgical Complications Five-Year Experience
Pierre A. Clavien et al.
ANNALS OF SURGERY (2009)
Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery:: A suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS)
Moritz N. Wente et al.
SURGERY (2007)
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies
Erik von Elm et al.
LANCET (2007)
Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH) -: An International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition
Moritz N. Wente et al.
SURGERY (2007)
Postoperative pancreatic fistula: An international study group (ISGPF) definition
C Bassi et al.
SURGERY (2005)
Share Paper
