4.1 Article

Evaluation of thickness-dependent temperature coefficient in a thin film thermocouple and its in vivo test using a porcine model

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10847-021-01067-5

Keywords

Thin film thermocouple (TFTC); Temperature coefficient; In vivo experiment; Porcine model

Funding

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education [NRF-2018R1D1A1B07049266]
  2. Chonnam National University (Smart Plant Reliability Center) - Ministry of Education, South Korea [2020R1A6C101B197]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2020R1A6C101B197] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Six types of micromachined thin film thermocouples with different thickness values were fabricated and tested for high sensitivity. The performance of each thermocouple was evaluated by measuring thermal electric motive force and temperature. An in vivo experiment in an animal model was conducted to evaluate device performance.
A micromachined thin film thermocouple (TFTC), that is, a contact-type temperature sensor, was fabricated to diagnose the physiological state. The TFTC involved two metal films (copper and constantan) with considerably different Seebeck coefficients. Six types of TFTCs with different film thickness values were fabricated and experimentally characterized to determine the thickness-dependent temperature coefficient attesting to a high sensitivity of the sensors. The performance of each TFTC was evaluated by measuring the induced thermal electric motive force and temperature in the temporal and spatial domains by using a data acquisition board and an infrared camera, respectively. Moreover, an in vivo experiment of the proposed TFTC with the highest temperature coefficient (38.9 mu V/degrees C) was conducted by measuring the body temperature difference of an anesthetized porcine model during its euthanasia process to evaluate the device performance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available