4.1 Article

Language Preference and Risk of Primary Cesarean Delivery: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Journal

MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH JOURNAL
Volume 25, Issue 7, Pages 1110-1117

Publisher

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10995-021-03129-z

Keywords

Cesarean delivery; Language preference; Disparities

Funding

  1. Harvard Catalyst \ The Harvard Clinical and Translational Science Center (National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health Award) [UL 1TR002541]
  2. Harvard University and its affiliated academic healthcare centers

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to examine the association between language preference and risk of primary cesarean delivery, finding a decreased risk among patients with a language preference other than English. Further research is needed to understand the clinical and social factors contributing to these disparities in cesarean delivery rates.
Objectives While some medical indications for cesarean delivery are clear, subjective provider and patient factors contribute to the rising cesarean delivery rates and marked disparities between racial/ethnic groups. We aimed to determine the association between language preference and risk of primary cesarean delivery. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex (NTSV) deliveries of patients over 18 years old from 2011-2016 at an academic medical center, supplemented with data from the Massachusetts Department of Public Health. We used modified Poisson regression with robust error variance to calculate risk ratios for cesarean delivery between patients with English language preference and other language preference, with secondary outcomes of Apgar score, maternal readmission, blood transfusion, and NICU admission. Results Of the 11,298 patients included, 10.3% reported a preferred language other than English, including Mandarin and Cantonese (61.7%), Portuguese (9.7%), and Spanish (7.5%). The adjusted risk ratio for cesarean delivery among patients with a language preference other than English was 0.85 (95% CI 0.72-0.997; p = 0.046) compared to patients with English language preference. No significant differences in risk of secondary outcomes between English and other language preference were found. Discussion After adjusting for confounders, this analysis demonstrates a decreased risk of cesarean delivery among women who do not have an English language preference at one institution. This disparity in cesarean delivery rates in an NTSV population warrants future research, raising the question of what clinical and social factors may be contributing to these lower cesarean delivery rates.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available