4.4 Article

Fitting Nonlinear Mixed-effects Models With Alternative Residual Covariance Structures

Journal

SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH
Volume 50, Issue 2, Pages 531-566

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0049124118789718

Keywords

longitudinal data analysis; nonlinear mixed-effects models; residual covariance structure; correlated residuals; hierarchical linear models

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Research has shown that the specification of within-individual residual covariance structure in linear mixed-effects models can impact the covariance matrix of random effects, model fit, and statistical inference. However, the consequences of this for nonlinear mixed-effects models are still unclear, necessitating researchers to consider alternative structures.
Nonlinear mixed-effects models are models in which one or more coefficients of the growth model enter in a nonlinear manner, such as appearing in the exponent of the growth function. In their applications, the within-individual residuals are often assumed to be independent with constant variance across time, an assumption that implies that the assumed growth function fully accounts for the dependencies and patterns of variation in the data. Studies have shown that a poorly specified within-individual residual covariance structure of a linear mixed-effects model can impact the estimated covariance matrix of the random effects at the second-level, model fit and statistical inference. The consequences for nonlinear mixed-effects models are not, however, clearly understood. This is due in part to the differences in the estimation needs of the two types of models. Using empirical data examples, this work illustrates the impact of fitting alternative residual covariance structures in nonlinear mixed-effects models that do not entirely parallel the results from studies of strictly linear mixed-effects models and call for the need of researchers to consider alternative structures when fitting nonlinear mixed-effects models.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available