4.5 Article

How to build a firebreak to stop smouldering peat fire: insights from a laboratory-scale study

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WILDLAND FIRE
Volume 30, Issue 6, Pages 454-461

Publisher

CSIRO PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1071/WF20155

Keywords

underground fire; wildfire fighting; peatland; quenching; soil moisture profile; peat fire suppression

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51876183]
  2. Society of Fire Protection Engineers (SFPE) Educational & Scientific Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines the feasibility of using firebreaks to control smouldering peat fires and identifies adding water and controlling peat layer thickness as key criteria for successful suppression of smouldering fires.
Smouldering wildfire is an important disturbance to peatlands worldwide; it contributes significantly to global carbon emissions and provides positive feedback to climate change. Herein, we explore the feasibility of firebreaks to control smouldering peat fires through laboratory-scale experiments. The dry-mass moisture content (MC) of peat soil was varied from 10% (air-dried) to 125%. We found that smouldering peat fire may be successfully extinguished above the mineral soil layer, even if the peat layer is not entirely removed. There are two criteria for an effective peat firebreak: (I) adding water to make the peat layer sufficiently wet (>115% MC in the present work); and (II) ensuring that the peat layer is thinner than the quenching thickness (< 5 cm). Criterion I may fail if the water table declines or the peat layer is dried by surface fires and hot weather; thus, satisfying Criterion II is more attainable. A sloping trench-shaped firebreak is recommended to guide water flow and help maintain high peat moisture content. This work provides a scientific foundation for fighting and mitigating smouldering wildfires and provides guidance about protective measures for field-scale peat fire experiments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available