3.9 Article

Economic policy uncertainty and executive turnover

Journal

CHINA JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages 83-100

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cjar.2020.11.003

Keywords

Economic policy uncertainty; Executive turnover; Risk taking; Director-manager duality

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71373162]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study suggests that economic uncertainty has a check-and-balance relationship with executive turnover. Executives are more likely to leave during corporate distress, but firms carefully consider executive changes in light of internal and external risk, reducing the likelihood of turnover.
This paper examines whether economic uncertainty increases executive turnover. The negative perception perspective and business change theory suggest that executives are more likely to leave their jobs during periods of corporate distress. However, the additive effects of internal and external risk are thought to prompt firms to carefully consider executive turnover, thereby reducing the likelihood of executive changes. Based on the literature, we propose a check-and-balance hypothesis for the relationship between external uncertainty and executive change, according to which the optimal superposition of the internal and external risks stemming from increased external uncertainty would be to avoid a wave of executive departures. Using a sample of Chinese A-share listed companies from 2010 to 2019 and the China economic policy uncertainty index of Baker et al. (2013), we examine the impact of economic policy uncertainty on executive turnover and our results support the check-and-balance hypothesis. Our findings enhance our understanding of how economic policy uncertainty affects executive turnover, and enrich the literature on corporate risk management and strategic management. (C) 2020 Sun Yat-sen University. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available