4.7 Article

Built environment, special economic zone, and housing prices in Shenzhen, China

Journal

APPLIED GEOGRAPHY
Volume 129, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2021.102429

Keywords

Housing prices; Special economic zone; Shenzhen; Hedonic model

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Research findings suggest that residential prices in Shenzhen are influenced by the special economic zones (SZEs), leading to an unbalanced spatial distribution of factors affecting housing prices. Therefore, there is a need to focus on collaborative urban redevelopment and equitable distribution of private and public services to reduce inequality between INSEZ and OUTSEZ.
Shenzhen?s meteoric urban growth is unprecedented, and its housing prices position it among the world?s top five most expensive cities. Commonly understood as a ?miracle city,? ?instant city,? and ?model city? orchestrated by the central state in modern experimental urban planning, the local context and the role of the SEZ are a neglected spatiality in housing studies focusing on Shenzhen. Drawing on open data (Lianjia.com), we examine Shenzhen?s spatial patterns of residential apartment prices and their associated local attributes. Based on a hedonic model, our results affirm a dichotomous spatial structure shaped by the special economic zones? (SEZs?) associated unbalanced distribution of both accessibility and public/private service amenities. Inside the original SEZ (INSEZ), cultural amenities, green space, shopping malls, and a central business district significantly affect housing prices. Outside the original SEZ (OUTSEZ), only proximity to metro stations positively affects housing prices. Urban redevelopment should concentrate more on collaborative redevelopment in urban villages and equity in private and public service provision to narrow the inequality between INSEZ and OUTSEZ.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available