3.8 Review

Is varus-valgus constraint a reliable option in complex primary total knee arthroplasty? A systematic review

Journal

JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS
Volume 24, Issue -, Pages 201-211

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2021.02.036

Keywords

Varus-valgus constraint; Constrained total knee; Primary total knee arthroplasty; Joint laxity; Coronal deformity

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The use of VVC implants in primary TKA seems to show improved functional outcomes and good mid-term survivorship. However, caution should be exercised due to the lack of long-term study data.
Purpose: Knee instability is considered one of the most frequent cause of failure after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). In order to address intraoperative instability, varus-valgus constrained knee implants (VVC) are increasingly utilized in primary TKA. Despite an increased risk of mechanical failure, short to mid-term results seem to be encouraging, but long-term results are still lacking. Methods: A systematic review of prospective and retrospective studies that reported clinical outcomes of patients with VVC systems in primary TKAs between 1990 and 2020 was performed. Results: In all, 28 articles met our inclusion criteria. A total of 2798 VVC implants were used in primary TKA. The all-cause revision-free survivorship was 95.2% at a mean follow-up of 7 years. Infection and aseptic loosening were the most common reasons for reoperation with an incidence of 1.8% and 1.7%, respectively. Overall complication rate was 9.6%, the most common complications were knee stiffness and infection with an incidence of 2.8% and 2.5%, respectively. Conclusions: VVC implants in primary TKA are associated with improved functional outcomes and good mid-term survivorship, comparable to lower level of constraint implants. Non-modular stemless seem to be reliable implants at mid-term follow-up. However, given the lack data coming from long-term studies, VVC implants should be used cautiously in primary TKA.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available