4.5 Review

How to untie G-quadruplex knots and why?

Journal

CELL CHEMICAL BIOLOGY
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages 436-455

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2021.01.015

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
  2. Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR-17-CE17-0010-01]
  3. Universite de Bourgogne
  4. Conseil Regional de Bourgogne
  5. European Union (FEDER SEQUENTIA program)
  6. INSERM Avesian Plan Cancer 2014-2019 [19CP117-00]
  7. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-17-CE17-0010] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Researchers have been studying how to use chemicals to interact with and stabilize G-quadruplexes (G4s) in cells for over two decades, achieving success in obtaining mechanistic interpretations. This has led to a fundamental reconsideration of G4-targeting strategies, with ongoing efforts to develop G4-stabilizing ligands and design molecular tools to unfold G4s.
For over two decades, the prime objective of the chemical biology community studying G-quadruplexes (G4s) has been to use chemicals to interact with and stabilize G4s in cells to obtain mechanistic interpretations. This strategy has been undoubtedly successful, as demonstrated by recent advances. However, these insights have also led to a fundamental rethinking of G4-targeting strategies: due to the prevalence of G4s in the human genome, transcriptome, and ncRNAome(collectively referred to as the G4ome), and their involvement in human diseases, should we continued eveloping G4-stabilizing ligands or should we invest in designing molecular tools to unfold G4s? Here, we first focus on how, when, and where G4s fold in cells; then, we describe the enzymatic systems that have evolved to counteract G4 folding and how they have been used as tools to manipulate G4s in cells; finally, we present strategies currently being implemented to devise new molecular G4 unwinding agents.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available