Journal
ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages -Publisher
RESILIENCE ALLIANCE
DOI: 10.5751/ES-12122-260103
Keywords
adaptation; agriculture; complex adaptive systems; farm systems; resilience assessment; social-ecological systems; vulnerability
Categories
Funding
- Ministry for Primary Industries' Sustainable Land Management and Climate Change (SLMACC) fund and Resilience to Nature's Challenges National Science Challenge
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Agriculture is a major economic driver in New Zealand, particularly dairy farming. However, dairy farming is vulnerable to climate and socioeconomic stressors. Efforts to enhance resilience, adaptability, and flexibility within the industry are increasing, with a focus on different types of farming systems and their implications. Low-input systems are less vulnerable to external factors compared to high-input systems, while organic farming offers ecological benefits and financial rewards.
Agriculture is a major economic driver in Aotearoa-New Zealand (New Zealand), led by export earnings from dairy farming. Dairying is uniquely exposed to climatic- and nonclimatic socioeconomic stressors, which have their greatest effects on production and yield. The growing need to consider these and other changes is accelerating efforts aimed at ensuring greater resilience, adaptability, and flexibility within the industry. To gain insight into these dynamics at the farm-level, a resilience-based assessment framework was piloted with three different types of dairy farming systems, following extensive drought on the east coast of the North Island. Using a participatory and bottom-up approach, the framework was used to qualitatively explore the potential significance of varying social, economic, and agroecological attributes between high-input, low-input, and organic systems, and their implications for resilience. The lock in trap of highly intensive systems, although profitable in the near term, may be less resilient to climate shocks because these are likely to occur in conjunction with changing market and financial risks. Low-input systems are less dependent, in particular, on fossil fuels and are associated with higher levels of farmer satisfaction and well-being. Organic farming provides ecological benefits, and the financial premium paid to farmers may act as a short-term buffer. The framework provides insight into the current context at the farm level and can draw out individual perspectives on where to target interventions and build resilience. Results demonstrate the potential of in-depth qualitative assessments of resilience, which can usefully complement quantitative metrics. The framework can be used as the basis for further empirical assessment and inform the design of similar approaches for cross-sector comparative analysis, large-N surveys, or modelling. Furthermore, the preliminary characterization of resilient farm-systems has the potential to contribute to broader sustainability frameworks for agriculture and can inform strategic adaptation planning in the face of climate change.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available