4.7 Article

A Meta-Analysis of Convolutional Neural Networks for Remote Sensing Applications

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSTARS.2021.3065569

Keywords

Remote sensing; Market research; Feature extraction; Systematics; Deep learning; Task analysis; Geology; Convolutional neural network (CNN); deep learning (DL); meta-analysis; remote sensing (RS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article presents a meta-analysis of 416 peer-reviewed journal articles, summarizing the advancements of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and their current status within the remote sensing community. Through statistical and descriptive analysis, it provides insights into the potential, key issues, and challenges of CNN applications in the RS field.
Since the rise of deep learning in the past few years, convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have quickly found their place within the remote sensing (RS) community. As a result, they have transitioned away from other machine learning techniques, achieving unprecedented improvements in many specific RS applications. This article presents a meta-analysis of 416 peer-reviewed journal articles, summarizes CNN advancements, and its current status under RS applications. The review process includes a statistical and descriptive analysis of a database comprised of 23 fields, including: 1) general characteristics, such as various applications, study objectives, sensors, and data types, and 2) algorithm specifications, such as different types of CNN models, parameter settings, and reported accuracies. This review begins with a comprehensive survey of the relevant articles without considering any specific criteria to give readers an idea of general trends, and then investigates CNNs within different RS applications to provide specific directions for the researchers. Finally, a conclusion summarizes potentialities, critical issues, and challenges related to the observed trends.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available