3.9 Article

Adding cognition to AT(N) models improves prediction of cognitive and functional decline

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/dad2.12174

Keywords

aging; Alzheimer' s disease; AT(N); cognitive decline; dementia; functional decline

Funding

  1. US Department of Veterans Affairs Clinical Sciences Research and Development Service
  2. National Institute of General Medical Sciences
  3. National Institutes of Health
  4. [U54GM115677]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to determine whether adding cognition to an AT(N) biomarker model could predict rates of cognitive and functional decline in older adults without dementia. Results showed that baseline cognitive status improved the prediction of decline in memory and function over a 4-year period, even when considering AT(N) biomarkers.
Introduction This study sought to determine whether adding cognition to a model with Alzheimer's disease biomarkers based on the amyloid, tau, and neurodegeneration/neuronal injury-AT(N)-biomarker framework predicts rates of cognitive and functional decline in older adults without dementia. Methods The study included 465 participants who completed amyloid positron emission tomography, cerebrospinal fluid phosphorylated tau, structural magnetic resonance imaging, and serial neuropsychological testing. Using the AT(N) framework and a newly validated cognitive metric as the independent variables, we used linear mixed effects models to examine a 4-year rate of change in cognitive and functional measures. Results The inclusion of baseline cognitive status improved model fit in predicting rate of decline in outcomes above and beyond biomarker variables. Specifically, those with worse cognitive functioning at baseline had faster rates of memory and functional decline over a 4-year period, even when accounting for AT(N). Discussion Including a newly validated measure of baseline cognition may improve clinical prognosis in non-demented older adults beyond the use of AT(N) biomarkers alone.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available