4.7 Article

Rainbow modified-ladder approximation and degenerate pion

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 103, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.103.074001

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It is found that the rainbow approximation is suitable for the gap equation, while the ladder approximation and modified-ladder approximation are effective truncation schemes for the Bethe-Salpeter equation. When studying the pion, it is observed that the pion mass and decay constant are equivalent in both the ladder and modified-ladder approximations, despite apparent differences in Bethe-Salpeter amplitudes. The justification for the modified-ladder approximation is examined using the Gell-Mann-Oakes-Renner relation.
Correlation functions can be described by the corresponding equations, viz., the gap equation for the quark propagator and the inhomogeneous Bethe-Salpeter equation for the vector dressed-fermion-Abeliangauge-boson vertex in which specific truncations have to be implemented. The general vector and axial-vector Ward-Green-Takahashi identities require these correlation functions to be interconnected; in consequence of this, truncations made must be controlled consistently. It turns out that, if the rainbow approximation is assumed in the gap equation, the scattering kernel in the Bethe-Salpeter equation can adopt the ladder approximation, which is one of the most basic attempts to truncate the scattering kernel. Additionally, a modified-ladder approximation is also found to be a possible symmetry-preserving truncation scheme. As an illustration of this approximation for application, a treatment of the pion is included. The pion mass and decay constant are found to be degenerate in ladder and modified-ladder approximations, even though the Bethe-Salpeter amplitudes arc with apparent distinction. The justification for the modified-ladder approximation is examined with the help of the Gell-Mann-Oakes-Renner relation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available