4.6 Article

Classical communication through quantum causal structures

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW A
Volume 103, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.103.042606

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council (ARC) by Centre of Excellence for Engineered Quantum Systems (EQUS) [CE170100009]
  2. Australian Research Council Discovery Early Career Researcher Award [DE170100712]
  3. RTP scholarship from the University of Queensland

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Quantum mechanics allows operations to be in indefinite causal order, leading to advantages in computational and communication tasks. Through the process matrix formalism, different classical capacities for a bipartite quantum process are formulated, showing a generalization of the Holevo bound. Bidirectional communication cannot exceed the limit of a one-way communication protocol in causally separable processes.
Quantum mechanics allows operations to be in indefinite causal order, leading to advantages in computational and communication tasks. However, basic notions such as communication capacity have not yet been formalized. In light of this, through the process matrix formalism, we formulate different classical capacities for a bipartite quantum process. For one-way communication, we find that general quantum processes satisfy a generalization of the Holevo bound, i.e., we can send, at most, one bit per qubit. The result also holds for processes with indefinite causal order and with shared entanglement between the sender and the receiver. We further extend known bounds to classical channel capacities, showing that general processes cannot outperform causally separable ones. Next, we study bidirectional communication through a causally separable process. Our result shows that a bidirectional protocol cannot exceed the limit of a one-way communication protocol. Finally, we generalize this result to a multiparty broadcast communication protocol through a definite ordered process.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available