4.2 Article

Super-resolved live-cell imaging using random illumination microscopy

Journal

CELL REPORTS METHODS
Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.crmeth.2021.100009

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale/(Inserm, Plan cancer 2014-2019)
  2. association Toulouse cancer sante (TCS, ApoMacImaging) [171441]
  3. European Research Council [648001]
  4. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique CNRS innovation
  5. European Research Council (ERC) [648001] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study introduces a super-resolution microscopy method called random illumination microscopy (RIM), which is suitable for live-cell imaging and easy to implement. RIM's simplicity and extended biological applicability can help biology laboratories to more easily utilize super-resolution microscopy.
Current super-resolution microscopy (SRM) methods suffer from an intrinsic complexity that might curtail their routine use in cell biology. We describe here random illumination microscopy (RIM) for live-cell imaging at super-resolutions matching that of 3D structured illumination microscopy, in a robust fashion. Based on speckled illumination and statistical image reconstruction, easy to implement and user-friendly, RIM is unaffected by optical aberrations on the excitation side, linear to brightness, and compatible with multicolor live-cell imaging over extended periods of time. We illustrate the potential of RIM on diverse biological applications, from the mobility of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) in U2OS cells and kinetochore dynamics in mitotic S. pombe cells to the 3D motion of myosin minifilaments deep inside Drosophila tissues. RIM's inherent simplicity and extended biological applicability, particularly for imaging at increased depths, could help make SRM accessible to biology laboratories.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available