4.7 Article

Reshaping the contexts of online customer engagement behavior via artificial intelligence: A conceptual framework

Journal

JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH
Volume 129, Issue -, Pages 902-910

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.11.002

Keywords

Artificial intelligence; Online customer engagement behaviors; Stimulus-organism-response; Information processing systems

Categories

Funding

  1. Academy of Finland [315604]
  2. Academy of Finland (AKA) [315604, 315604] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper discusses the applications of artificial intelligence in improving interactions between firms and customers online. By utilizing information processing systems and the Stimulus-Organism-Response theory, it details how firms and customers can enhance the outcomes of online engagement behaviors through artificial intelligence technology.
As new applications of artificial intelligence continue to emerge, there is an increasing interest to explore how this type of technology can improve automated service interactions between the firm and its customers. This paper aims to develop a conceptual framework that details how firms and customers can enhance the outcomes of firm-solicited and firm-unsolicited online customer engagement behaviors through the use of information processing systems enabled by artificial intelligence. By building on the metaphor of artificial intelligence systems as organisms and taking a Stimulus-Organism-Response theory perspective, this paper identifies different types of firm-solicited and firm-unsolicited online customer engagement behaviors that act as stimuli for artificial intelligence organisms to process customer-related information resulting in both artificial intelligence and human responses which, in turn, shape the contexts of future online customer engagement behaviors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available