4.7 Article

A conversation-based perspective for shaping ethical human-machine interactions: The particular challenge of chatbots

Journal

JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH
Volume 129, Issue -, Pages 927-935

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.018

Keywords

Artificial intelligence; Chatbot; Ethical challenges; Online conversations; Conversation management

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using chatbots to manage online interactions with consumers presents ethical challenges tied to AI applications and raises new avenues for research. This study highlights concerns about the ethical implications of non-real conversations managed by non-moral agents, as well as the integration of AI in conversational processes. It proposes a new conceptual model that incorporates ethical considerations for the future development of chatbots.
The use of chatbots to manage online interactions with consumers poses additional ethical challenges linked to the use of artificial intelligence (AI) applications and opens up new ethical avenues for investigation. A literature analysis identifies a research gap regarding the ethical challenges related to chatbots as non-moral and non-independent agents managing non-real conversations with consumers. It raises concerns about the ethical implications related to the progressive automation of online conversational processes and their integration with AI. The conversational approach has been explored in the organisational and management literature, which has analysed the features and roles of conversations in managing interactions ethically. This study aims to discuss conceptually the ethical challenges related to chatbots within the marketplace by integrating the current chatbot-based literature with that on conversation management studies. A new conceptual model is proposed which embraces ethical considerations in the future development of chatbots.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available