4.7 Article

Optimising nitrogen fertilisation: A key to improving nitrogen-use efficiency and minimising nitrate leaching losses in an intensive wheat/maize rotation (2008-2014)

Journal

FIELD CROPS RESEARCH
Volume 206, Issue -, Pages 1-10

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2017.02.016

Keywords

Grain yield; Nitrogen-use efficiency; Nitrate residue; Nitrate leaching; Apparent N loss

Categories

Funding

  1. Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest [201003014]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Optimising nitrogen (N) fertilisation is critically important for obtaining high crop yields with low environmental costs. A seven-year field experiment was conducted to evaluate the effects of the rate of N application on crop yield, N-use efficiency (NUE), nitrate residue (NR), and nitrate leaching in an intensive wheat/maize rotation system on the Loess Plateau of China. Five treatments were tested: a control (no N fertilisation) and conventional, low, moderate, and high rates of N fertilisation. Nitrates were leached mainly after heavy rains and with flood irrigation and varied notably between years. Annual nitrate-leaching loss (ANLL) averaged 3.4-17.3 kg N ha(-1) y(-1) at N rates of 165-495 kg N ha(-1). Crop yields increased quadratically and NUE decreased linearly with increasing rates of N application. NR and ANLL increased exponentially. Compared with conventional management, moderate N fertilisation increased NUE and decreased NR and ANLL by 46 and 34%, respectively, without any significant decrease in crop yield. High yields can thus be achieved at a moderate N rate and an economically optimal N rate with less ANLL and acceptable soil NR. We recommend N-application rates of 150-170 and 180-200 kg N ha(-1) for wheat and maize, respectively, for obtaining high crop yields with low environmental risks. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available