4.6 Article

RBD-specific polyclonal F(ab′)2 fragments of equine antibodies in patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 disease: A randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, adaptive phase 2/3 clinical trial

Journal

ECLINICALMEDICINE
Volume 34, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100843

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ministerio de Desarrollo Productivo of Argentina through Programa soluciona. Reactivacion de la Economia del Conocimiento
  2. Agencia Nacional de Promocion de la Investigacion, el Desarrollo Tecnologico y la Innovacion of the Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnologia e Innovacion de Argentina

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although the trial did not reach the primary endpoint, there was clinical improvement observed in hospitalized patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia, especially in those with severe disease.
Background: passive immunotherapy is a therapeutic alternative for patients with COVID-19. Equine polyclonal antibodies (EpAbs) could represent a source of scalable neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2. Methods: we conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial to assess efficacy and safety of EpAbs (INM005) in hospitalized adult patients with moderate and severe COVID-19 pneumonia in 19 hospitals of Argentina. Primary endpoint was improvement in at least two categories in WHO ordinal clinical scale at day 28 or hospital discharge (ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT04494984). Findings: between August 1st and October 26th, 2020, a total of 245 patients were enrolled. Enrolled patients were assigned to receive two blinded doses of INM005 (n = 118) or placebo (n = 123). Median age was 54 years old, 65.1% were male and 61% had moderate disease at baseline. Median time from symptoms onset to study treatment was 6 days (interquartile range 5 to 8). No statistically significant difference was noted between study groups on primary endpoint (risk difference [95% IC]: 5.28% [-3.95; 14.50]; p = 0.15). Rate of improvement in at least two categories was statistically significantly higher for INM005 at days 14 and 21 of follow-up. Time to improvement in two ordinal categories or hospital discharge was 14.2 (+/- 0.7) days in the INM005 group and 16.3 (+/- 0.7) days in the placebo group, hazard ratio 1.31 (95% CI 1.0 to 1.74). Subgroup analyses showed a beneficial effect of INM005 over severe patients and in those with negative baseline antibodies. Overall mortality was 6.9% the INM005 group and 11.4% in the placebo group (risk difference [95% IC]: 0.57 [0.24 to 1.37]). Adverse events of special interest were mild or moderate; no anaphylaxis was reported. Interpretation: Albeit not having reached the primary endpoint, we found clinical improvement of hospitalized patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia, particularly those with severe disease. (C) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available