4.1 Article Data Paper

Relative abundances of benthic foraminifera in response to total organic carbon in sediments: Data from European intertidal areas and transitional waters

Journal

DATA IN BRIEF
Volume 35, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2021.106920

Keywords

Living Benthic foraminifera; Relative abundances; Total organic carbon; Intertidal areas; Transitional waters; English channel; European atlantic coast; Mediterranean sea

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation
  2. Agence de l'Eau Artois-Picardie
  3. Communauted'Agglomeration du Boulonnais
  4. Universitede Lille
  5. Universitedu Littoral Cote d'Opale
  6. Laboratoire d'Oceanologie et de Geosciences
  7. Spanish MINECO (MCIU/AEI/FEDER, UE) [RTI2018-095678-B-C21]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study collected total organic carbon and relative abundances of benthic foraminifera from intertidal areas and transitional waters in different regions of Europe, calculated their optimum and tolerance range using the weighted-averaging method, to assign them to ecological groups of sensitivity.
We gathered total organic carbon (%) and relative abundances of benthic foraminifera in intertidal areas and transitional waters from the English Channel/European Atlantic Coast (587 samples) and the Mediterranean Sea (301 samples) regions from published and unpublished datasets. This database allowed to calculate total organic carbon optimum and tolerance range of benthic foraminifera in order to assign them to ecological groups of sensitivity. Optima and tolerance range were obtained by mean of the weighted-averaging method. The data are related to the research article titled Indicative value of benthic foraminifera for biomonitoring: assignment to ecological groups of sensitivity to total organic carbon of species from European intertidal areas and transitional waters[1]. (C) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available