3.8 Article

Public knowledge, attitude, practices, and level of anxiety toward the COVID-19 pandemic among people living in Oman

Journal

NURSING FORUM
Volume 56, Issue 3, Pages 596-603

Publisher

WILEY-HINDAWI
DOI: 10.1111/nuf.12592

Keywords

anxiety; COVID-19; knowledge; preventive practices; stress

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that most individuals have a high level of knowledge about COVID-19, believe the disease is not fatal and countries can control the virus, but also experience high levels of stress and anxiety. Higher levels of anxiety, knowledge, and being married are associated with more preventive practices.
The purpose was to examine knowledge, attitudes and preventive practices, as well as anxiety and stress of people living in a Gulf country with a diverse population toward the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. A descriptive cross-sectional, exploratory design was used to meet the aims of this study. The target population was all individuals aged 18 years and older and who can read and write Arabic, English, or Hindi. The results showed that most individuals demonstrated a high level of knowledge regarding COVID-19. Most individuals believed that COVID-19 is not fatal and that countries can control the COVID-19 virus. Despite the lower levels of anxiety and stress among this population, many individuals reported high levels of stress and anxiety. Higher levels of anxiety, higher levels of knowledge, and being married were associated with more preventive practices. This study showed that the level of knowledge is positively associated with compliance with preventive measures. Providing the public with accurate and consistent information regarding COVID-19 may enhance their compliance with preventive measures. Using different risk communication strategies will ensure collaboration from the public and encourage them to be active members when facing contagious diseases

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available