4.7 Article

Improved representation of the global dust cycle using observational constraints on dust properties and abundance

Journal

ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages 8127-8167

Publisher

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/acp-21-8127-2021

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [1552519, 1856389]
  2. Army Research Office [W911NF-20-2-0150]
  3. University of California President's Postdoctoral Fellowship
  4. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under Marie SklodowskaCurie [641816, 708119, 789630]
  5. JSPS KAKENHI [20H04329]
  6. Integrated Research Program for Advancing Climate Models (TOUGOU) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), Japan [JPMXD0717935715]
  7. NASA Atmospheric Composition: Modeling and Analysis Program
  8. NASA [80NSSC19K1346]
  9. Future Investigators in NASA Earth and Space Science and Technology (FINESST) program
  10. NASA Modeling, Analysis and Prediction Program [NNG14HH42I]
  11. NASA EMIT project
  12. MIUR (Progetto Dipartimenti di Eccellenza) [2018-2022]
  13. European Research Council [773051]
  14. EU H2020 project FORCES [821205]
  15. Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities [RYC-2015-18690, CGL2017-88911-R]
  16. Earth Venture -Instrument program [E678605]
  17. PolEASIA ANR project under allocation [ANR15-CE04-0005]
  18. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20H04329] Funding Source: KAKEN
  19. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [708119, 789630] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The researchers developed a new methodology using inverse modeling to improve the representation of the global dust cycle, finding that the emission flux of dust is greater than many models account for. Their results show the need for more accurate datasets to quantify the impact of dust on the Earth system.
Even though desert dust is the most abundant aerosol by mass in Earth's atmosphere, atmospheric models struggle to accurately represent its spatial and temporal distribution. These model errors are partially caused by fundamental difficulties in simulating dust emission in coarse-resolution models and in accurately representing dust microphysical properties. Here we mitigate these problems by developing a new methodology that yields an improved representation of the global dust cycle. We present an analytical framework that uses inverse modeling to integrate an ensemble of global model simulations with observational constraints on the dust size distribution, extinction efficiency, and regional dust aerosol optical depth. We then compare the inverse model results against independent measurements of dust surface concentration and deposition flux and find that errors are reduced by approximately a factor of 2 relative to current model simulations of the Northern Hemisphere dust cycle. The inverse model results show smaller improvements in the less dusty Southern Hemisphere, most likely because both the model simulations and the observational constraints used in the inverse model are less accurate. On a global basis, we find that the emission flux of dust with a geometric diameter up to 20 mu m (PM20) is approximately 5000 Tg yr(-1), which is greater than most models account for. This larger PM20 dust flux is needed to match observational constraints showing a large atmospheric loading of coarse dust. We obtain gridded datasets of dust emission, vertically integrated loading, dust aerosol optical depth, (surface) concentration, and wet and dry deposition fluxes that are resolved by season and particle size. As our results indicate that this dataset is more accurate than current model simulations and the MERRA-2 dust reanalysis product, it can be used to improve quantifications of dust impacts on the Earth system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available