4.3 Article

Uncovering opportunities for effective species conservation banking requires navigating technical and practical complexities

Journal

CONSERVATION SCIENCE AND PRACTICE
Volume 3, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/csp2.431

Keywords

biodiversity offsets; compensatory mitigation; endangered species act; listed species; mitigation hierarchy; no net loss

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Species Conservation Banking in the USA is a prominent example of compensatory biodiversity impact mitigation, facing challenges such as defining trading currencies, regulatory and political uncertainty, and lack of policies and standards. Recommendations are formulated to help stakeholders navigate the complexity and improve the chances of beneficial biodiversity outcomes being achieved.
In the USA, Species Conservation Banking is a prominent example of compensatory biodiversity impact mitigation, with an annual market value estimated at US$354.2 million. Species Conservation Banking represents a useful case study of a well-established program that can provide empirical insights into the practicalities of implementing quantitative compensatory biodiversity mitigation on-the-ground. Using semi-structured key-informant interviews structured around well-established technical challenges to compensatory mitigation, this study aimed to understand (i) how and why these challenges are or are not addressed in practice; and (ii) how these challenges relate to practical challenges faced by conservation banking stakeholders on-the-ground. Challenges identified included: (i) defining trading currencies and equivalence, (ii) regulatory and political uncertainty, (iii) regulatory agency capacity, will and knowledge, (iv) lack of policies, standards, and competition with other mitigation mechanisms, (v) long-term uncertainty/longevity, and (vi) lack of species knowledge and data transparency. These challenges are numerous, diverse, interlinked and transdisciplinary, and collectively inhibit the ability of practitioners to resolve underlying technical challenges-a finding likely applicable to related biodiversity offset programs. To help address challenges and navigate this complexity, we formulate several recommendations for conservation banking stakeholders to improve the chances of beneficial biodiversity outcomes being achieved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available