4.5 Article

Microscopic calculation of fission product yields with particle-number projection

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW C
Volume 103, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.103.054602

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NUCLEI SciDAC-4 collaboration [DE-SC001822]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory [DE-AC5207NA27344]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study combines a fully microscopic collective model with an extension of the particle number projection formalism to provide the highest-fidelity prediction of the primary fission fragment distributions for U-235 and Pu-239 neutron-induced fission, and enables the realistic determination of two-dimensional isotopic yields within nuclear density functional theory for the first time.
Fission fragments' charge and mass distribution is an important input to applications ranging from basic science to energy production or nuclear nonproliferation. In simulations of nucleosynthesis or calculations of superheavy elements, these quantities must be computed from models, as they are needed in nuclei where no experimental information is available. Until now, standard techniques to estimate these distributions were not capable of accounting for fine-structure effects, such as the odd-even staggering of the charge distributions. In this work, we combine a fully microscopic collective model of fission dynamics with a recent extension of the particle number projection formalism to provide the highest-fidelity prediction of the primary fission fragment distributions for the neutron-induced fission of U-235 and Pu-239. We show that particle-number projection is an essential ingredient to reproduce odd-even staggering in the charge yields and benchmark the performance of various empirical probability laws that could simulate its effect. This new approach also enables for the first time the realistic determination of two-dimensional isotopic yields within nuclear density functional theory.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available