4.2 Article

Standardization and harmonization in hematology: Instrument alignment, quality control materials, and commutability issue

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LABORATORY HEMATOLOGY
Volume 43, Issue 3, Pages 364-371

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ijlh.13379

Keywords

alignment; analytical quality; commutability; control material; hematologic analyzers

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study verified the applicability of a protocol for the alignment of hematology analyzers based on control material rather than fresh whole-blood samples. Results showed complete alignment for most parameters, but partial misalignments were evident for certain white cell series parameters, highlighting the importance of paying attention to the values of the material used for alignment.
Introduction In the hub and spoke laboratory network, the number of hematology analyzers (HAs) within each core center has increased, and the control of HAs alignment is becoming necessary requirement to ensure analytical quality. In this scenario, HA alignment can be assessed by analyzing the same control material used for internal quality control on multiple HAs, assuming its commutability. The aim of the study was to verify the applicability of a protocol for the alignment of HAs based on control material rather than on fresh whole-blood samples. Methods The alignment of five HAs was evaluated for red (RBC, Hb, MCV, RET), white (WBC, NE, LY, MO, EO, BA, IG), and platelet (PLT) series parameters, following a protocol by SIBioC, using human sample (HS) and quality control material (QC), after the verification of commutability, according to the IFCC protocol. Maximum bias was derived from biological variation data. Results A complete alignment between instruments was confirmed for the majority of the parameters investigated both for HS and QC material. Partial misalignments or inconcludent results were instead evident for MCV, MO, EO, BA, and IG. Interestingly, QC material was found to be not commutable for LY, MO, and BA. Conclusion The alignment of hematologic analyzers for main cell population parameters may be verified with both QC and HS, displaying consistent results and interpretation. The evaluation for some white series parameters (EO, BA, and IG) is critical, and particular attention must be paid to the values of the material used for the alignment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available