Journal
WORK-A JOURNAL OF PREVENTION ASSESSMENT & REHABILITATION
Volume 68, Issue 4, Pages 1187-1202Publisher
IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.3233/WOR-213448
Keywords
Awareness; design; mindfulness; sensory modality feedback; wearables
Categories
Funding
- Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This research compared different feedback modalities on individuals' experience and ability to perform breath-based techniques at work. Sound was found to be the most successful feedback for the majority of participants, followed by vibration and ambient light. Participants exhibited three different feedback patterns: ignoring the feedback, not understanding the feedback and being overwhelmed by it, and successfully using the feedback to initiate deep breathing and reflect on the change in the quality of breathing.
BACKGROUND: Deep breathing exercises are known to help decrease stress. Wearable and ambient computing can help initiate and support deep breathing exercises. Most studies have focused on a single sensory modality for providing feedback on the quality of breathing and other physiological data. OBJECTIVE: Our research compares different feedback modalities on an individual's experience and ability to perform breath-based techniques at work. METHODS: We designed three different interactive prototypes that used light, vibration and sound feedback modalities. We tested each prototype with 19 participants whilst they were performing typical work tasks in a naturalistic setting, followed by semi-structured interviews. RESULTS: We found that sound was the most successful feedback for the majority of participants, followed by vibration and ambient light. We developed an analytic tool, the Extended Cycle of Awareness, to facilitate understanding of the patterns of awareness and the flow of experience generated by participant interaction with prototype systems that provide feedback on the quality of breathing. Participants followed one of three different types of patterns: (1) ignoring the feedback; (2) not understanding the feedback and being overwhelmed by it; (3) successfully using the feedback to initiate deep breathing and reflect on the change in the quality of breathing. CONCLUSIONS: We offer a set of design recommendations for crafting interactive systems to support deep breathing at work, including personalization, designing for the cyclical process of attention and awareness, and designing for reflective practice.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available