4.6 Article

Accurately predicting optical properties of rare-earth, aluminate scintillators: influence of electron-hole correlation

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY C
Volume 9, Issue 23, Pages 7292-7301

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1tc01151k

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) Directed Research and Development Program
  2. National Nuclear Security Administration of the U.S. Department of Energy [89233218CNA000001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study emphasizes the importance of many-particle corrections in simulating luminescent profiles of rare-earth perovskite scintillators, revealing significant differences in excitation wavelengths compared to traditional approaches. Understanding the trade-off between accuracy and performance of various theoretical tools is crucial in defining search parameters for new scintillator development.
A theoretical and computational analysis of two approaches to simulate luminescent profiles of rare-earth perovskite scintillators is given. This work establishes the importance of many-particle corrections in the prediction of the principal excitation wavelength, revealing that they lead to differences of nearly one hundred nanometers from the standard Delta-SCF approach. We show the electronic structure of this class of materials uniquely necessitates a many-particle treatment because, in contrast to traditional semiconductors, rare-earth scintillator materials are weakly screened and relatively few bands dominate the radiative decay channels. This makes accounting for long-range electron-hole correlations a central issue in accurate predictions, and we discuss the trade-off between accuracy and performance of various popular approaches. Understanding the strengths and weaknesses of available theoretical tools will help define search parameters for new scintillator development.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available