4.6 Review

Modern trends in Green primary energetic materials

Journal

NEW JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY
Volume 45, Issue 23, Pages 10150-10159

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1nj01227d

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. University of Ottawa
  2. NSERC-DG

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The ever-growing demand for cleaner and higher-performing energetic materials has led to a quest to replace toxic metal-based traditional energetic compounds. This review examines strategies for the design and synthesis of next-generation nitrogen-rich, green primary explosives, focusing on potassium-based energetic salts, metal-free ionic energetic salts, and metal-free covalent energetic materials. Different combinations of nitrogen-rich frameworks and energetic substituents are highlighted for their explosive performance, initiability, safety, and environmental impact, along with key parameters associated with energetic materials.
The evergrowing demand for cleaner, high-performing energetic materials (EMs) has led to a quest for replacement of currently used toxic metal-based traditional energetic compounds such as lead azide and lead styphnate. As such, significant effort has been placed on the implementation of nitrogen-rich frameworks as cleaner and safer alternatives to the environmentally harmful EMs. This review examines strategies for the design and synthesis of next-generation nitrogen-rich, green primary explosives. Three categories of this class of materials are examined, namely potassium-based energetic salts, metal-free ionic energetic salts and metal-free covalent energetic materials. Within each subsection, different combinations of nitrogen-rich frameworks and energetic substituents are highlighted in terms of their explosive performance, initiability, safety and environmental impact. As well, a brief summary and description of key parameters associated with energetic materials is also provided.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available