3.9 Article

Combination of 1,2,3-triazole and 1,2,4-triazole frameworks for new high-energy and low-sensitivity compounds

Journal

ENERGETIC MATERIALS FRONTIERS
Volume 2, Issue 2, Pages 131-138

Publisher

KEAI PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enmf.2021.05.002

Keywords

1,2,3-Triazole; 1,2,4-Triazole; Nitrogen-rich heterocyclic; Energetic materials

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21875110, 22075143]
  2. Science Challenge Project [TZ2018004]
  3. Qing Lan Project

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A series of energetic compounds based on C-C linked 1,2,3-triazole and 1,2,4-triazole were synthesized and characterized in this study. These compounds exhibit high thermal stability, fast detonation velocities, and low mechanical sensitivity compared to RDX, showing potential for advancing the development of new high-energy density materials.
In this study, a series of energetic compounds based on C-C linked 1,2,3-triazole and 1,2,4-triazole were synthesized and characterized, i.e., 5-(5-nitro-2H-1,2,3-triazole-4-yl)-4H-1,2,4-triazole-3,4-diamine (compound 1), N(3-amino-5-(5-nitro-2H-1,2,3-triazole-4-yl)-4H-1,2,4-triazole-4-yl) nitramide (compound 4), and their energetic salts (compounds 2, 3, 5, and 6). The structures of compounds 1, 2, and 4 were determined by X-ray diffraction. All the new compounds feature acceptable thermal stability (T-dec = 185 -266 degrees C), with thermal decomposition temperature higher than that of RDX (T-dec = 204 degrees C) except for compound 6 (T-dec = 185 degrees C). Moreover, the detonation velocities of compounds 5 and 6 are 9200 m.s(-1) and 9024 m.s(-1), respectively, which are higher than that of RDX (D = 8795 m.s(-1)). Furthermore, the new compounds show low mechanical sensitivity (IS = 20 J, FS = 240 N) compared to RDX (IS = 7.4 J, FS = 120 N). These results will help to accelerate the development of new high-energy density materials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available