4.4 Article

Do you remember? Rater memory systems and leadership measurement

Journal

LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY
Volume 32, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2020.101455

Keywords

Episodic and semantic memory processes; Measurement; Leadership ratings

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study demonstrates that questionnaire items can be classified based on their emphasis on episodic or semantic memory, and scales based on episodic memory are more associated with trust than scales based on semantic memory. Interventions that encourage raters to rely on episodic memory can reduce false alarms in leadership ratings.
Despite widespread concerns about the use of retrospective accounts of leader behavior and response tendencies associated with raters who tend to rely on semantic memory, little attention has been devoted to developing methods that move measurement processes beyond those based on semantic memory to those based on episodic memory. The results from a series of six studies demonstrate a) questionnaire items can be classified in terms of their emphasis on episodic or semantic memory and the language used in items is associated with different types of memory processes, b) scales based on episodic memory have a greater association with trust than do scales based on semantic memory, c) the procedure that requires raters to indicate whether their response to each item is based on semantic or episodic memory dramatically reduces the impact of liking on leadership ratings, and d) the memory source intervention that encourages raters to rely on episodic memory reduces false alarms in leadership ratings. Taken together, these results demonstrate that rater memory systems are an important component of the leadership rating process and that consideration of the type of memory elicited during that process can be used to improve leadership measurement.& nbsp; & nbsp;(c) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available