4.7 Article

Theoretical and observational bounds on some interacting vacuum energy scenarios

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 103, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.103.083520

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11705079, 11647153]
  2. Liaoning Revitalization Talents Program [XLYC1907098]
  3. Mathematical Research Impact-Centric Support Scheme (MATRICS) [MTR/2018/000940]
  4. Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB), Govt. of India
  5. MINECO (Spain) [MTM2017-84214-C2-1-P]
  6. Catalan Government [2017-SGR-247]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study focuses on the energy flow interaction between dark matter and dark energy, using various interaction functions in four distinct cosmic scenarios. The analysis reveals the importance of handling these interaction models with caution.
The dynamics of interacting dark matter-dark energy models is characterized through an interaction rate function quantifying the energy flow between these dark sectors. In most of the interaction functions, the expansion rate Hubble function is considered and sometimes it is argued that, as the interaction function is a local property, the inclusion of the Hubble function may influence the overall dynamics. This is the starting point of the present article where we consider a very simple interacting cosmic scenario between vacuum energy and the cold dark matter characterized by various interaction functions originated from a general interaction function: Q = Gamma rho(alpha)(c)rho(1-alpha-beta)(x) (rho(c) + rho(x))(beta), where rho(c), rho(x) are respectively the cold dark matter density and vacuum energy density; alpha, beta are real numbers and Gamma is the coupling parameter with dimension equal to the dimension of the Hubble rate. We investigate four distinct interacting cosmic scenarios and constrain them both theoretically and observationally. Our analyses clearly reveal that the interaction models should be carefully handled.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available