4.7 Article

Large-Scale Preparation of Durable VO2 Nanocomposite Coatings

Journal

ACS APPLIED NANO MATERIALS
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages 4048-4054

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsanm.1c00387

Keywords

large-scale; nanocomposite; vanadium dioxide; smart window; weatherability

Funding

  1. National Key RAMP
  2. D Program of China [2016YFB0303901]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51702209]
  4. Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Commission [18JC1412800]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study analyzed the failure mechanism of VO2 nanoparticles at room temperature, designed a new formulation for VO2 nanocomposite coatings to improve weatherability, and developed a continuous roll-coating method for large-scale preparation.
Vanadium dioxide (VO2) glass is a promising thermochromic smart energy-saving window. Many studies have been carried out for improving its optical performance, but for practical applications, the weatherability and large-scale preparation still remain as obstacles. In this work, the failure mechanism of VO2 nanoparticles at room temperature was analyzed, a new formulation of the VO2 nanocomposite coatings was designed to improve the coatings' weatherability, and a continuous roll-coating method was developed for large-scale preparation. The process is an all-solution-based low-temperature (240 degrees C) method and has no specific requirements for atmosphere. The size of the samples prepared using the current method is as large as 1.2 x 1.0 m(2). The prepared samples showed significantly improved weatherability compared to a reported water system (sixfold increase in moisture resistance test), excellent optical performance with a phase-transition temperature of 30 degrees C (T-lum = 55.0 % (10 degrees C) and 51.0 % (70 degrees C) and Delta T-sol = 16.6%), and phase-transition stability (less than 5% performance loss after 7000 cycles).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available