4.7 Article

Low energy constraints from absolute neutrino mass observables and lepton flavor violation in left-right symmetric model

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 103, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.103.055016

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the context of the minimal left-right symmetric model, correlations among the three absolute neutrino mass observables were studied, with consideration given to two phenomenological cases and independent constraints from various sources. The study determined the combined allowed parameter space for future experiments and revealed constraints on heavy particle masses and neutrino mass observables. These constraints have the potential to rule out unexplored parameter space by collider experiments.
We have studied the correlations among the three absolute neutrino mass observables-the effective Majorana mass (m(ee)) which can be obtained from neutrinoless double beta decay, the electron neutrino mass (m(beta)) which is measured in single beta decay experiments, and the sum of the light neutrino masses (Sigma) which is constrained from cosmological observations, in the context of minimal left-right symmetric model. Two phenomenologically interesting cases of type-I seesaw dominance as well as type-II seesaw dominance have been considered. We have taken into account the independent constraints coming from lepton flavor violation, single beta decay, cosmology, and neutrinoless double beta decay and have determined the combined allowed parameter space that can be probed in the future experiments. We have also analyzed the correlations and tensions between the different mass variables. In addition, the constraints on the masses of the heavy particles coming from lepton flavor violation and the bounds on three absolute neutrino mass observables are also determined. We show that these constraints can rule out some of the parameter space which are not probed by the collider experiments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available