4.2 Article

Using the JD-R Model to Predict the Organizational Outcomes of Social Workers in Guangzhou, China

Journal

Publisher

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/714311

Keywords

job satisfaction; burnout; organizational commitment; turnover intentions; social work in China

Categories

Funding

  1. Guangzhou Social Work Association

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study, conducted on social workers from Integrated Family Services Centers in Guangzhou, China, applied the JD-R model to demonstrate the positive impact of job resources on organizational commitment and the negative impact of job demands on turnover intentions.
Objective: An examination of how job burnout and job satisfaction are jointly associated with social workers' commitment and turnover intentions is critical to understanding the underlying mechanisms of social workers' turnover intentions. Using the job demands-resources (JD-R) model, this study examined the relationships between job satisfaction and organizational outcomes (e.g., turnover intentions and organizational commitment) and how job burnout (i.e., exhaustion and cynicism) mediated these relationships. Method: We applied the JD-R model to 748 social workers from the Integrated Family Services Centers in Guangzhou, China. Job demands were measured as workloads, and job resources were measured as support from organizations (e.g., supervisory support) and professional associations (e.g., career development). Results: Our results provide evidence for the extended dual process of the JD-R model: the health-impairment process and the motivation-driven process. Social workers' job demands (i.e., workload) influenced their intentions to leave the organization, whereas social workers' job resources predicted their commitment to the organization. Conclusion: Our findings confirm the importance of providing job resources to social workers in Integrated Family Services Centers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available