4.2 Review

Effects of Rapid Weight Loss on Kidney Function in Combat Sport Athletes

Journal

MEDICINA-LITHUANIA
Volume 57, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/medicina57060551

Keywords

weight cutting; making weight; creatinine; blood urea nitrogen; urine specific gravity; renal system; health; performance

Funding

  1. Serbian Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development [179011]
  2. Provincial Secretariat for Higher Education and Scientific Research [142-451-2094]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Research shows that rapid weight loss can lead to dehydration and acute kidney damage in combat sport athletes, potentially causing adverse effects on other body systems. It is important to consider alternative weight reduction methods that prioritize athletes' health.
Even though scientific literature shows numerous heath complications and performance decrements associated with rapid weight loss (RWL), its prevalence remains exceedingly high across various combat sports. The aim of this study was to thoroughly search the existing literature to explore the influence of RWL on kidney function in Olympic and non-Olympic combat sport athletes. PubMed and Web of Science were searched for the relevant studies. Only original articles published from 2005 onwards, written in English, that included healthy males and females who prompted similar to 5% weight loss within a week or less, were included in the study. Retrieved studies showed that creatinine, blood urea nitrogen and urine specific gravity values were significantly increased after RWL in the majority of the included studies. This observation indicates that RWL caused dehydration and subsequent acute kidney damage despite various degrees of weight lost during the RWL phase, which can lead to adverse events in other body systems. Alternative methods of weight reduction that prioritize athletes' health should be considered.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available