4.0 Article

Coronary Artery Disease Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS) Adoption: Analysis of Local Trends in a Large Academic Medical Center

Journal

RADIOLOGY-CARDIOTHORACIC IMAGING
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

RADIOLOGICAL SOC NORTH AMERICA (RSNA)
DOI: 10.1148/ryct.2021210016

Keywords

Coronary Arteries; CT Angiography

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study retrospectively reviewed the adoption of CAD-RADS at a high-volume cardiac CT service and found rapid and widespread adoption. Opt-outs from using CAD-RADS were more common in cases with higher degree of stenosis, stents, and coronary artery bypass grafts (CABGs). Dissections and anomalous coronary artery were the most common exceptions to CAD-RADS.
Purpose: To perform a retrospective review of Coronary Artery Disease Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS) adoption at a highvolume cardiac CT service. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, the adoption of CAD-RADS in 6562 coronary CT angiography (CTA) reports from January 1, 2017, to February 13, 2020, was evaluated. Reports without CAD-RADS were classified as opt-outs or exceptions to CADRADS. CAD-RADS classifications were retrospectively assigned to the opt-outs and the clinical indications for coronary CTA. Results: CAD-RADS scores were reported in 95% (6264 of 6562) of cases. Among the 5% (n = 298) of reports not reported according to CAD-RADS, 58% (n = 172) were considered opt-outs and 42% (n = 126) were exceptions. Cases with higher degree of stenosis, stents, and coronary artery bypass grafts (CABGs) occurred more often in opt-outs versus reports with CAD-RADS (odds ratio [OR], 8.3 [95% CI: 1.6, 42.1]; P <.001). The quarterly opt-out rate decreased over consecutive quarters in the 1st year (OR, 0.77 [95% CI: 0.61, 0.96]; P =.01), then stabilized. Quarterly opt-out rate for patients with stents decreased over time (OR, 0.82 [95% CI: 0.73, 0.92]; P =.008), as did the opt-out rates in patients with CABG (OR, 0.83 [95% CI: 0.76, 0.91]; P,.001). Exceptions (n = 126) included coronary dissections (44%), anomalous coronary arteries (41%), coronary artery aneurysms or pseudoaneurysms (10%), vasculitis (2%), stent complications (2%), and extrinsic compression of grafts (2%). Conclusion: CAD-RADS was adopted rapidly and widely. Readers opted out of its use most often in complex cases of CAD, and the most common exceptions were coronary dissections and anomalous coronary artery.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available