4.0 Article

Effects of apolipoprotein B on lifespan and risks of major diseases including type 2 diabetes: a mendelian randomisation analysis using outcomes in first-degree relatives

Journal

LANCET HEALTHY LONGEVITY
Volume 2, Issue 6, Pages E317-E326

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/S2666-7568(21)00086-6

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Novo Nordisk Foundation [NNF17OC0027034]
  2. Medical Research Council [MR/T002239/1]
  3. Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking [875534]
  4. EU Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme
  5. European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations
  6. T1D Exchange
  7. Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation
  8. Obesity Action Coalition
  9. Wellcome [098381, 106130, 203141, 212259]
  10. Sigrid Juselius Foundation, Finland
  11. UK Medical Research Council
  12. British Heart Foundation Intermediate Clinical Research Fellowship [FS/18/23/33512]
  13. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Oxford Biomedical Research Centre
  14. Medical Research Council Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol [MC_UU_00011/1]
  15. MRC [MC_UU_00011/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Genetically elevated apoB is associated with shorter lifespan in parents, increased risks of heart disease and stroke, and higher risk of diabetes, especially when accounting for LDL cholesterol.
Background Apolipoprotein B (apoB) is emerging as the crucial lipoprotein trait for the role of lipoprotein lipids in the aetiology of coronary heart disease. In this study, we evaluated the effects of genetically predicted apoB on outcomes in first-degree relatives. Methods Data on lipoprotein lipids and disease outcomes in first-degree relatives were obtained from the UK Biobank study. We did a univariable mendelian randomisation analysis using a weighted genetic instrument for apoB. For outcomes with which apoB was associated at a false discovery rate (FDR) of less than 5%, multivariable mendelian randomisation analyses were done, including genetic instruments for LDL cholesterol and triglycerides. Associations between apoB and self-reported outcomes in first-degree relatives were characterised for 12 diseases (including heart disease, stroke, and hypertension) and parental vital status together with age at death. Estimates were inferred causal effects per 1 SD elevated lipoprotein trait (for apoB, 1 SD=0.24 g/L). Replication of estimates for lifespan and type 2 diabetes was done using conventional two-sample mendelian randomisation with summary estimates from genomewide association study consortia. Findings In univariable mendelian randomisation, genetically elevated apoB in participants was identified to lead to a shorter lifespan in parents (fathers: 0.89 years of life lost per 1 SD higher apoB in offspring, 95% CI 0.63-1.16, FDR-adjusted p=4.0 x 10-(10); mothers: 0.48 years of life lost per 1 SD higher apoB in offspring, 0.25-0.71, FDR-adjusted p=1.7 x 10(-4)). The effects were strengthened to around 2 years of life lost in multivariable mendelian randomisation and were replicated in conventional two-sample mendelian randomisation (odds ratio [OR] of surviving to the 90th centile of lifespan: 0.38 per 1 SD higher apoB in offspring, 95% CI 0.22-0.65). Genetically elevated apoB caused higher risks of heart disease in all first-degree relatives and a higher risk of stroke in mothers. Findings in first-degree relatives were replicated in two-sample multivariable mendelian randomisation, which identified apoB to increase (OR 2.32 per 1 SD higher apoB, 95% CI 1.49-3.61) and LDL cholesterol to decrease (0.34 per 1 SD higher LDL cholesterol, 0.21-0.54) the risk of type 2 diabetes. Interpretation Higher apoB shortens lifespan, increases risks of heart disease and stroke, and in multivariable analyses that account for LDL cholesterol, increases risk of diabetes. Copyright (C) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available