Care, not incarceration: exploring the carcerality of fisheries enforcement and potential decolonial futures in Hawai'i

Current U.S. environmental management paradigms default to enforcement mechanisms that feed into the prison industrial complex, such as fines and jailing. To avoid contributing to and reinforcing mass incarceration and militarism, environmental management systems need to be transformed towards non-carceral forms. Additionally, working towards Indigenous sovereignty and decolonization, requires the strengthening of Indigenous relations with and governance over the land under the respective paradigms of Indigenous communities. This paper uses Hawai'i state fisheries law and programmatic efforts to address a central question: What is the extent and nature of carceral norms within conventional environmental management systems and how do they affect management outcomes? The study examines the current fisheries enforcement scheme in Hawai'i, tracing the embedded logic of carcerality, the degree to which ultimate sources of harm are addressed, and the concentration of governing powers. The results highlight how current fisheries enforcement is insufficient in caring for the seascape and, through its carceral approach, contributes to social injustices, particularly for Kanaka Maoli (Native Hawaiians). Additionally, this paper demonstrates how current efforts in Hawai'i - Community-Based Subsistence Fisheries Areas (CBSFAs), the 'Aha Moku system, and the Makai Watch Program - attempt to empower communities, but ultimately keep enforcement powers centralized within the State, thus perpetuating dependency on the criminal justice system. This study ends with a discussion on how future decarceral environmental governance systems could be designed to center Hawaiian relations & paradigms, particularly by prioritizing the values of reeducation, rematriation, and restoration.

Automated summary

The current environmental management paradigms in the US default to enforcement mechanisms such as fines and jailing, which contribute to mass incarceration and militarism. To avoid reinforcing these systems, transformation towards non-carceral forms is necessary. This study focuses on the implications of carceral norms within conventional environmental management systems, using Hawai'i state fisheries law as a case study. Results show that current fisheries enforcement is inadequate in caring for the seascape and perpetuates social injustices for Native Hawaiians. Efforts to empower communities in Hawai'i still centralize enforcement powers within the State, continuing dependency on the criminal justice system. The study suggests that future decarceral environmental governance systems should prioritize Hawaiian relations and values like reeducation, rematriation, and restoration.