4.7 Article

Inflammatory and vascular markers and olfactory impairment in older adults

Journal

AGE AND AGEING
Volume 44, Issue 5, Pages 878-882

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afv075

Keywords

olfaction; atherosclerosis; inflammation; population-based; epidemiology; older people

Funding

  1. National Institute on Aging [R37AG011099]
  2. National Eye Institute [U10EY06594]
  3. Research to Prevent Blindness

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: to determine if inflammatory markers and atherosclerosis are associated with the development of olfactory impairment in older adults. Design: longitudinal, population-based study. Setting/participants: a total of 1,611 participants, aged 53-97 years in the Epidemiology of Hearing Loss Study without olfactory impairment at the 1998-2000 examination and with follow-up at a subsequent examination 5 and/or 10 years later. Methods: the San Diego Odor Identification Test was used to measure olfaction. High sensitivity C-reactive protein, interleukin-6 and tumour necrosis factor-alpha were measured in serum and carotid ultrasound images were obtained for the measurement of carotid intima media thickness (IMT) and plaque assessment. Medical history, behavioural and lifestyle information were obtained by interview. Results: inflammatory markers, IMT and plaque were not associated with the 10-year cumulative incidence of olfactory impairment in adjusted Cox proportional hazard models. Among those < 60 years, the mean IMT [hazard ratio (HR) = 4.35, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.69-11.21, tertile 3 versus tertile 1] and the number of sites with plaque (HR = 1.56, 95% CI = 1.17-2.08, per site) were associated with an increased risk of developing an olfactory impairment at follow-up. Conclusion: subclinical atherosclerosis at a younger age may be a risk factor for the development of olfactory impairment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available