4.5 Article

High frequency of ocular toxoplasmosis in Quindio, Colombia and risk factors related to the infection

Journal

HELIYON
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06659

Keywords

Ocular toxoplasmosis; Toxoplasma gondii; Screening; Risk factors; Retinochoroiditis; Colombia

Funding

  1. Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnologia e Innovacion (Colombia) [773-2018]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to determine the frequency of retinochoroidal lesions caused by ocular toxoplasmosis and their relationships with risk factors in Armenia-Quindio, Colombia. The results showed that 10.5% of individuals had retinochoroidal scars suggestive of old inactive Toxoplasma gondii infection, and consumption of bottled water was found to be protective against T. gondii infection.
Objectives: To determine the frequency of retinochoroidal lesions by ocular toxoplasmosis and their relationships with risk factors, in residents of two districts with high exposure to Toxoplasma, in Armenia-Quindio, Colombia. Methods: Cross-sectional analyses of fundoscopy screening, serological tests, and questionnaires were performed to determine risk factors associated with ocular toxoplasmosis retinochoroidal lesions. Differences in proportions were analyzed using the chi-squared test. Results: Of 161 individuals examined, 17 (10.5%) exhibited retinochoroidal scars suggestive of old inactive Toxoplasma gondii infection. All 17 individuals were seropositive for T. gondii antibodies. Consumption of bottled water was protective against T. gondii infection among individuals in this study. There were no specific epidemiological risk factors associated with ocular toxoplasmosis retinochoroidal lesions. Conclusion: Ocular toxoplasmosis is an important cause of visual impairment in Armenia-Quindio, Colombia. The consumption of boiled or bottled water is a major preventive public health measure to reduce infection by T. gondii and the subsequent onset of OT.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available