The Janus Face of the Liberal International Information Order: When Global Institutions Are Self-Undermining

Scholars and policymakers long believed that norms of global information openness and private-sector governance helped to sustain and promote liberalism. These norms are being increasingly contested within liberal democracies. In this article, we argue that a key source of debate over the Liberal International Information Order (LIIO), a sub-order of the Liberal International Order (LIO), is generated internally by self-undermining feedback effects, that is, mechanisms through which institutional arrangements undermine their own political conditions of survival over time. Empirically, we demonstrate how global governance of the Internet, transnational disinformation campaigns, and domestic information governance interact to sow the seeds of this contention. In particular, illiberal states converted norms of openness into a vector of attack, unsettling political bargains in liberal states concerning the LIIO. More generally, we set out a broader research agenda to show how the international relations discipline might better understand institutional change as well as the informational aspects of the current crisis in the LIO.

Automated summary

This article argues that the debate over the Liberal International Information Order (LIIO) is generated internally by self-undermining feedback effects. The global governance of the Internet, transnational disinformation campaigns, and domestic information governance interact to sow the seeds of this contention. A broader research agenda is set out to better understand institutional change as well as the informational aspects of the current crisis in the Liberal International Order (LIO).