4.7 Article

Hierarchical Onsager symmetries in adiabatically driven linear irreversible heat engines

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW E
Volume 103, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.103.L050101

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [19K03651]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19K03651] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper develops a linear response theory for adiabatically changing parameters and temperature differences in heat engines. It establishes a hierarchical relationship between global and local linear response relations, deriving a detailed expression for global Onsager coefficients and a tighter efficiency bound than Carnot bound for linear irreversible heat engines. The theory is demonstrated using the simplest stochastic Brownian heat engine model.
In existing linear response theories for adiabatically driven cyclic heat engines, Onsager symmetry is identified only phenomenologically, and a relation between global and local Onsager coefficients, defined over one cycle and at any instant of a cycle, respectively, is not derived. To address this limitation, we develop a linear response theory for the speed of adiabatically changing parameters and temperature differences in generic Gaussian heat engines obeying Fokker-Planck dynamics. We establish a hierarchical relationship between the global linear response relations, defined over one cycle of the heat engines, and the local ones, defined at any instant of the cycle. This yields a detailed expression for the global Onsager coefficients in terms of the local Onsager coefficients. Moreover, we derive an efficiency bound, which is tighter than the Carnot bound, for adiabatically driven linear irreversible heat engines based on the detailed global Onsager coefficients. Finally, we demonstrate the application of the theory using the simplest stochastic Brownian heat engine model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available