Journal
JOURNAL OF ASIA-PACIFIC ENTOMOLOGY
Volume 24, Issue 2, Pages 77-83Publisher
KOREAN SOC APPLIED ENTOMOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.aspen.2021.03.012
Keywords
Sequential exposure; Proboscis extension response; Foraging behavior; Sugar responsiveness; Memory retention
Categories
Funding
- BSRP through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), Ministry of Education [NRF-2018R1A6A1A03024862]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The study found that sequential exposure to amitraz and thiacloprid affected honey bees' learning, memory, and sugar response. High doses of pesticides significantly reduced bees' acquisition and memory retention abilities.
Pollinators, honey bees in particular, are continuously exposed to various mixtures of pesticides, which contribute to their population decline. Both amitraz and thiacloprid have been proven less toxic to honey bees and are frequently applied in- and out-hive, respectively. We examined the sub-lethal effects of amitraz, thiacloprid and their sequential exposure on learning, memory and sugar responsiveness in Apis mellifera using the Proboscis extension response (PER). Sub-lethal doses of amitraz (0.1, 0.2 and 0.4 mu g/bee) and thiacloprid (0.05, 0.1 and 0.2 mu g/bee) were tested. Sub-lethal effects were observed only at the highest doses of each pesticide treatment; amitraz (0.4 mu g/bee) and thiacloprid (0.2 mu g/bee) but not in lower doses. In sequential treatment of amitraz and thiacloprid, reduced acquisition and memory retention were significant across all tested doses. The same profile was also obtained on sugar responsiveness of foragers. Our results suggest that the sequential exposure would pose higher risk to honey bee compared to single pesticide exposure by reducing the bees' appetitive olfactory learning, memory and sugar acuity more than individual pesticide exposures.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available