Journal
NEUROREHABILITATION AND NEURAL REPAIR
Volume 35, Issue 7, Pages 601-610Publisher
SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/15459683211011214
Keywords
stroke; spasticity; motor recovery; ICF; rehabilitation
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The relationship between poststroke spasticity and motor recovery can be confusing. True motor recovery involves neural recovery and repair in the acute and subacute stages, while functional recovery is mainly mediated by compensatory mechanisms. Spasticity interferes with true motor recovery but does not affect functional recovery in the acute and subacute stages, although appropriate management can lead to improvement in motor function during the chronic stage of stroke.
The relationship of poststroke spasticity and motor recovery can be confusing. True motor recovery refers to return of motor behaviors to prestroke state with the same end-effectors and temporo-spatial pattern. This requires neural recovery and repair, and presumably occurs mainly in the acute and subacute stages. However, according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, motor recovery after stroke is also defined as improvement in performance of functional tasks, i.e., functional recovery, which is mainly mediated by compensatory mechanisms. Therefore, stroke survivors can execute motor tasks in spite of disordered motor control and the presence of spasticity. Spasticity interferes with execution of normal motor behaviors (true motor recovery), throughout the evolution of stroke from acute to chronic stages. Spasticity reduction does not affect functional recovery in the acute and subacute stages; however, appropriate management of spasticity could lead to improvement of motor function, that is, functional recovery, during the chronic stage of stroke. We assert that spasticity results from upregulation of medial cortico-reticulo-spinal pathways that are disinhibited due to damage of the motor cortex or corticobulbar pathways. Spasticity emerges as a manifestation of maladaptive plasticity in the early stages of recovery and can persist into the chronic stage. It coexists and shares similar pathophysiological processes with related motor impairments, such as abnormal force control, muscle coactivation and motor synergies, and diffuse interlimb muscle activation. Accordingly, we propose a new definition of spasticity to better account for its pathophysiology and the complex nuances of different definitions of motor recovery.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available