4.3 Article

HIV-Related Stigma Among Youth Living With HIV in Western Uganda

Journal

QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH
Volume 31, Issue 10, Pages 1937-1950

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/10497323211012347

Keywords

HIV; youth; qualitative; grounded theory; Uganda; stigma; interviews

Funding

  1. University of Applied Sciences and Arts (HOGENT
  2. PAR4CO-DEV)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents an explanatory theory for HIV-related stigma from the perspectives of youth living with HIV/AIDS in Western Uganda, offering a stigma process model with insights into the causes, consequences, and moderators of HIV-related stigma. The specific focus on YLWHA and contextual characteristics adds new dimensions to the understanding of HIV-related stigma. Further research is needed to identify context-specific strategies to overcome stigmatizing views and behaviors among YLWHA in Western Uganda.
We present an explanatory theory for HIV-related stigma from the perspectives of youth living with HIV/AIDS (YLWHA) in Western Uganda, on which the fight against this relentless stigma in this age group and locality can be founded. A constant comparative method was used to analyze textual data from in-depth interviews with 35 YLWHA, selected from three health facilities. A stigma process model for YLWHA was developed with the stigmatizing feelings and behaviors as the core category. Concepts delineating causes, consequences, and moderators of HIV-related stigma emerged from the data to complete the stigma process. The specific focus on YLWHA and contextual characteristics adds new dimensions to the understanding of HIV-related stigma that are scant in existing HIV-related stigma models. In light of our findings, research is necessary to identify context-specific strategies to overcome the deep-rooted causes of stigmatizing views and behaviors in all social spheres of YLWHA within Western Uganda.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available