4.5 Article

Contact allergy to acrylates and methacrylates in consumers and nail artists - data of the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology, 2004-2013

Journal

CONTACT DERMATITIS
Volume 72, Issue 4, Pages 224-228

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cod.12348

Keywords

acrylates; contact sensitization; cosmetics; methacrylates; nail sculpturing

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Allergic contact dermatitis caused by (meth) acrylates used in artificial nails is a relevant problem in both nail artists and consumers. Objective. To analyse the frequency of this problem in the contact allergy surveillance network Information Network of Departments of Dermatology in 2004-2013, and address possible time trends and patterns of co-sensitization. Methods. A retrospective analysis of patch test results with (meth) acrylates, along with clinical and demographic data, was performed. These were used to subdivide patients according to (i) a potentially exposed occupation and (ii) nail cosmetics as the suspected cause of contact dermatitis. Results. Among the 114 440 patients patch tested, 72 244 were female and were considered further. Eighty-seven patients both worked as nail artists/cosmetologists and suspected nail cosmetics as the cause of dermatitis. Among these, 47.1% reacted to at least one (meth) acrylate, most often to 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (n= 27), 2-hydroxypropyl methacrylate, and hydroxyethyl acrylate (n= 26 each), with marked coupled reactivity. In other subgroups of interest, frequencies of sensitization to (meth) acrylates were less elevated but higher than in all remaining female patients (n= 69 419). Conclusions. The results indicate a not entirely common, but potentially serious, problem, especially concerning occupationally exposed, and sensitized, nail artists. Adequate protective measures should be taught as part of the vocational training.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available