4.7 Article

Graph Signal Processing Meets Blind Source Separation

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING
Volume 69, Issue -, Pages 2585-2599

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TSP.2021.3073226

Keywords

Adjacency matrix; approximate joint diagonalization; Cramer-Rao bound; graph moving average model; independent component analysis

Funding

  1. Academy of Finland [319822, 298118]
  2. Academy of Finland (AKA) [319822, 319822] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper fills the gap in blind source separation research for graph signals with two contributions. The results show that utilizing both graph structure and non-Gaussianity provides a more robust approach, which is demonstrated to be more efficient in separating non-Gaussian graph signals.
In graph signal processing (GSP), prior information on the dependencies in the signal is collected in a graph which is then used when processing or analyzing the signal. Blind source separation (BSS) techniques have been developed and analyzed in different domains, but for graph signals the research on BSS is still in its infancy. In this paper, this gap is filled with two contributions. First, a nonparametric BSS method, which is relevant to the GSP framework, is refined, the Cramer-Rao bound (CRB) for mixing and unmixing matrix estimators in the case of Gaussian moving average graph signals is derived, and for studying the achievability of the CRB, a new parametric method for BSS of Gaussian moving average graph signals is introduced. Second, we also consider BSS of non-Gaussian graph signals and two methods are proposed. Identifiability conditions show that utilizing both graph structure and non-Gaussianity provides a more robust approach than methods which are based on only either graph dependencies or non-Gaussianity. It is also demonstrated by numerical study that the proposed methods are more efficient in separating non-Gaussian graph signals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available